 
|
trancemaster
Fresh ideas |
    
Scotlands bid to host Euro 2008 was doomed the day the arsea concerned decided to revamp our national dump.If they had listened to the fans and built a new stadium in Perth and added Inverness then they could have sold Scotland as Scotland.Too much emphasis was put on Glasgow.How many other bids had three stadia in one city?We must have been a laughing stock.Effin loodicruss........
-----
1 Lion on our shirt
|
Total Posts: 9 | Joined Dec. 2002 | Posted on: 8:12 am on Dec. 13, 2002 | IP
|
|
Mazzy
GET A LIFE!!! |
Nice avatar trancemaster 
-----
"D`ye think Pele had a pair of Predators?" AP jnr
|
Total Posts: 849 | Joined May 2002 | Posted on: 9:28 am on Dec. 13, 2002 | IP
|
|
William Wallace
GET A LIFE!!! |
I don't quite see what you're getting at. Do you think we should left one of Hampden, Ibrox and Celtic Park out of the bid? Surely that'd be madness. Stadia were gonnae be built in Aberdeen and Dundee, and we'd have two in Edinburgh and two(?) in Ireland so why Perth and Inverness? Considering the populations of Perth and Inverness, it'd be unlikely they'd ever be used again, look how many people go to see St.Johnstone and Caley Thistle.
-----
Scotland Forever
http://www.get.to/scotlandthebrave - Undergoing maintenance and re-design
|
Total Posts: 1382 | Joined Jan. 2002 | Posted on: 6:31 pm on Dec. 13, 2002 | IP
|
|
ReekySporran
GET A LIFE!!! |
I think you missed the point WW. The decision to redevelop Hampden was taken years before the decision to bid for 2008, the point is that this decision has in the end hampered rather than helped the bid.
Should Hampden have been redeveloped at all? in my opinion no, in fact I wouldn't have built any new stadium, Murrayfield is a state of the art stadium that is barely used, but its not in Glasgow......
-----
www.sporran-legion.co.uk
|
Total Posts: 1292 | Joined Sep. 2001 | Posted on: 9:49 pm on Dec. 13, 2002 | IP
|
|
JimFaeKdy
GET A LIFE!!! |
Quote: from ReekySporran on 9:49 pm on Dec. 13, 2002
Should Hampden have been redeveloped at all? in my opinion no, in fact I wouldn't have built any new stadium, Murrayfield is a state of the art stadium that is barely used, but its not in Glasgow......
Totally agree wi ye Reeky.
-----
http://www.ktarmy.co.uk
|
Total Posts: 1741 | Joined Sep. 2001 | Posted on: 10:46 pm on Dec. 13, 2002 | IP
|
|
William Wallace
GET A LIFE!!! |
Well if that was the point I did miss it.
-----
Scotland Forever
http://www.get.to/scotlandthebrave - Undergoing maintenance and re-design
|
Total Posts: 1382 | Joined Jan. 2002 | Posted on: 11:27 pm on Dec. 13, 2002 | IP
|
|
JimFaeKdy
GET A LIFE!!! |
That`s ok then.
-----
http://www.ktarmy.co.uk
|
Total Posts: 1741 | Joined Sep. 2001 | Posted on: 12:01 am on Dec. 14, 2002 | IP
|
|
William Wallace
GET A LIFE!!! |
Great news.
-----
Scotland Forever
http://www.get.to/scotlandthebrave - Undergoing maintenance and re-design
|
Total Posts: 1382 | Joined Jan. 2002 | Posted on: 1:10 am on Dec. 14, 2002 | IP
|
|
|
|
Tartan Army Message Board
Theres more to Scotland than Glasgow
